Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not so fast, Christian soldiers
LA Times ^ | 22 August 2007 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 08/22/2007 8:09:00 AM PDT by shrinkermd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: George W. Bush

>>And if you’re serving in Iraq, I think you’re entitled to the game and to play either side. Just like Christian soldiers are.<<

I think the soldiers should have any damn thing they need and just about anything we can possibly give them that they want. Certainly including whatever video games they want, certainly including this one.

But these people took an incredibly popular book series and made a truly unworthy game out of it. I just don’t feel sympathy for really, really bad game makers.


121 posted on 08/22/2007 11:23:01 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Wow. And to think we, as a nation, help to free communist countries which ultimately gave them freedom to worship. Think of all the people who risked their lives to smuggle bibles into closed countries. Who would ever think such a minuscule group of people in America could so boldly object to others enjoying their freedom and to actually have influence?

I say let them move to China.


122 posted on 08/22/2007 11:34:33 AM PDT by jer33 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
But these people took an incredibly popular book series and made a truly unworthy game out of it. I just don’t feel sympathy for really, really bad game makers.

Sorry, but they're really really bad books too. LOL.

But I don't lay awake nights worrying that my fellow-citizens or our soldiers in Iraq might read those books or play those games either.

It's called liberty. Give it a try sometime.
123 posted on 08/22/2007 11:35:49 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; Mr. Silverback
GWB: Give it a try sometime.

That's "Give it a try some time."

I blame Mr. Silverback's evil influence for having exposed me to such ungrammatical contractions on another thread.
124 posted on 08/22/2007 11:39:40 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I suspect the real reason the Pentagon stopped this had a LOT more to do with that video game than Christianity, per se.

Remember how that soldier was court martialed a few years ago for refusing to serve with the UN? That started an angry debate in every US enlisted and officer club on every corner of the planet, and *nobody* would speak up on behalf of the UN.

“I hate the UN.” “I hate the UN more than you do.” I hate the UN more than anybody.” “Do not, I do.” etc.

In other words, there are a LOT of soldiers who have now reached the firm conviction that being assigned to serve the UN is NOT worth staying in uniform for. They will quit the US military or be fired before they will do it.

To allow the soldiers to have a video game where they are actually *fighting* UN soldiers! What a nightmare!

Right now, the military personnel services must cringe at the very idea of the next time the US government decides to commit US military personnel to a UN mission. That one court martial could turn into a hundred, with as many resignations from officers and senior NCOs. Having UN service in your 201 file might mean the end of your career anyway.

In fact, it would be a VERY good idea for the Pentagon to start quietly polling military personnel about exactly how much they hate the idea of working for the UN.


125 posted on 08/22/2007 11:40:01 AM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith; xzins
There you go. Thanks, padre. That's all I'm sayin...

I think you might have said just a wee bit more than that. LOL.

Now that I've made it clear that you can also play the blue-helmets shooting the Christians, are you sure we can't interest you in a copy of the game?
126 posted on 08/22/2007 11:43:03 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Popocatapetl
Remember how that soldier was court martialed a few years ago for refusing to serve with the UN?

A hero to us here at FR.

That started an angry debate in every US enlisted and officer club on every corner of the planet, and *nobody* would speak up on behalf of the UN.

Good. They understood they swore an oath to the Constitution, not the U.N. Charter.

“I hate the UN.” “I hate the UN more than you do.” I hate the UN more than anybody.” “Do not, I do.” etc.

Sounds like hundreds of threads we had at FR. Good stuff too.

To allow the soldiers to have a video game where they are actually *fighting* UN soldiers! What a nightmare!

Well, they could choose to be Antichrists and shoot Christians instead.

And it's not a nightmare. It's patriotic.

Right now, the military personnel services must cringe at the very idea of the next time the US government decides to commit US military personnel to a UN mission. That one court martial could turn into a hundred, with as many resignations from officers and senior NCOs. Having UN service in your 201 file might mean the end of your career anyway.

What's your problem with this exactly?

In fact, it would be a VERY good idea for the Pentagon to start quietly polling military personnel about exactly how much they hate the idea of working for the UN.

Are you sure you're on the right website?
127 posted on 08/22/2007 11:48:30 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: jer33 3

Wonder what Brother Andrew would say about this? He risked his life many, many times smuggling bibles into countries that could have ended his life for doing just that.


128 posted on 08/22/2007 11:49:41 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Wonder what Brother Andrew would say about this?

What rank was Brother Andrew?

129 posted on 08/22/2007 11:57:57 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Taking my heart to Heaven with me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

“Wonder what Brother Andrew would say about this?”

Start smuggling them into China, (Hong Kong), North Korea, etc, etc, etc.


130 posted on 08/22/2007 12:09:39 PM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
Start smuggling them into China, (Hong Kong), North Korea, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, we'll have to smuggle them to our soldiers inside Iraq as well.
131 posted on 08/22/2007 12:10:51 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Yep, the American Bible Society sends Bibles to service personnel.


132 posted on 08/22/2007 12:11:30 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

You might have misinterpreted. I am not opposed to these care packages. And I do not think that US military personnel are wrong in not wanting to serve under UN command.

But being prior service, I cringe at just about anything that is going to get service personnel that bent out of shape. I would wince just as much as if Congress decided to demand that all military personnel don pink tutus and do ballet.

I truly doubt that collectively there might be a mutiny of some sort against serving with the UN, unless of course some leftist twit like Hillary decided to rub it in their face; but I would not be surprised to see a lot of good personnel throw away their careers and retirement, or even go to military prison because they were forced to. And this would be a shame. To lose good people because they were ordered to do something repugnant to them.

But back to my main point. I think the Pentagon realizes this, and *that* was the main reason they banned those care packages. The soldiers already disdain the UN. Letting them play a game that encourages them to kill UN personnel is just going to make things harder for the military, and its people, in the future.

Right now, for the most part, they can still get enough soldiers to volunteer for UN missions. But I don’t know by how much. And when they can’t get volunteers, they have to order them to do it. And that’s when the trouble starts.

And I don’t want to see our soldiers get into trouble.


133 posted on 08/22/2007 12:24:24 PM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Per post 132:

“The American Bible Society sends Bibles to service personnel.”


134 posted on 08/22/2007 12:25:53 PM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Popocatapetl
But being prior service, I cringe at just about anything that is going to get service personnel that bent out of shape. I would wince just as much as if Congress decided to demand that all military personnel don pink tutus and do ballet.

They swear an oath to our country, not to a criminally corrupt incompetent group of internationalists, socialists, globalists and enemies of human rights such as compose the membership of the United Nations.

...I would not be surprised to see a lot of good personnel throw away their careers and retirement, or even go to military prison because they were forced to. And this would be a shame. To lose good people because they were ordered to do something repugnant to them.

But it is repugnant. And since we have and believe in a volunteer force, why should you be afraid of our soldiers choosing not serve the United Nations or leaving the military over the issue?

Right now, for the most part, they can still get enough soldiers to volunteer for UN missions.

It is unfortunate that we have any deployed for and under the U.N. But it may provide a way to shunt incompetent persons away from missions like Iraq. I doubt our military is wasting its best soldiers on a U.N. mission. Nor should they.

Right now, for the most part, they can still get enough soldiers to volunteer for UN missions. But I don’t know by how much. And when they can’t get volunteers, they have to order them to do it. And that’s when the trouble starts. And I don’t want to see our soldiers get into trouble.

Then you should vocally oppose such deployments under U.N. auspices. That is the source of the trouble, not our patriotic soldiers who know and understand exactly that to which they swore their oath of military service.
135 posted on 08/22/2007 12:33:46 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
“The American Bible Society sends Bibles to service personnel.”

Fine and good (hopefully a trustworthy translation, no NIVs, paraphrases, etc.)

But the ABS isn't sending them video games. I don't see why people are getting their panties in such a knot over some Xbox game.
136 posted on 08/22/2007 12:35:44 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: billbears; Abcdefg; Extremely Extreme Extremist
You might enjoy this thread. FReepers seriously quoting Marx against religion as an opiate, worrying over whether our troops might not like the United Nations enough, advocating censorship of Christian materials (including video games) for our soldiers in Iraq.

More love for "the troops". To me, this is the kind of love for "the troops" you normally find at a liberal website.
137 posted on 08/22/2007 12:43:27 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I don’t think you understand the purpose of the military.


138 posted on 08/22/2007 12:54:02 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; gondramB
I blame Mr. Silverback's evil influence for having exposed me to such ungrammatical contractions on another thread.

Sounds to me like more hypocrisy of the shrimp marketing variety...

139 posted on 08/22/2007 12:58:27 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Libs obviously don’t believe pro-lifers are terrorists, or they'd placate us by banning abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Sounds to me like more hypocrisy of the shrimp marketing variety...

I'm so surprised you'd say that. LOL.
140 posted on 08/22/2007 1:02:33 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson