Even a blind pig can find an acorn now and then.
Our military officers IN IRAQ are saying Maliki is part of the problem and ought to be replaced.
Our Military Officers are fighting and working tirelessly to combat terrorism and assist Iraq. They a) know what they are talking about and b) have a stake in it.
Those Democrats (especially Levin) have done NOTHING constructive, but only bitching and propagating for their shortterm political gain by bumping for surrender and withdrawal. This disqualifies them.
Maliki is going to be replaced anyway, and I’m not going to miss him. But the Democrats mess up this situation even more. Without the feeling that we are going to leave the Iraqis won’t have the need to look for other patrons and partners.
“Our military officers IN IRAQ are saying Maliki is part of the problem and ought to be replaced.”
I’ve heard our military commanders say that Iran is part of the problem, but I never heard them say Maliki was. Nor have I seen them call for his removal. Who are you referring to?
“WWJBD - “What would Jack Bauer Do?”) “
He would murder a U.S. agent like Chappelle in an effort to appease a bio-terrorist mastermind like Saunders. ;-)