Why is this complicated?
Behe says that the theory of evolution is insufficient to explain the advanced state of mutations in a range of organisms.
That suggestion does not per se require the existence of God thought it may be more amenable to the possibility than the blinding atheist dogma that evolutionary scientism Darwin’s theory has been transformed into by ideologues.
Behe has a reasonable argument. If evolution is so awesome, why can it not be subject to debate?
Evolutionists refuse to debate facts because their hypothesis has failed to muster any material chemical, biological, mathematical, or archeological support.
The whole hypothesis is propped up by a stubborn resistance to the obvious creative genius in every living thing.
One need only examine the fabulous complexity of the simplest cell to conclude that this thing couldn’t have sprung itself into existence.