Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: this is my name not yours
I am past retirement age and won’t be buying another house. I would never have considered an interest only mortgage. How could you ever gain. You would have to see 12% annual appreciation to get ahead. This is a professional couple. Where is the common sense?
41 posted on 08/21/2007 8:47:01 AM PDT by DaltonNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: DaltonNC

Let me explain it to you. It comes from the capital structure theory called the “pecking order” theory of Myers and Majluf (1984) and Myers (1984). The idea is that financial flexibility gives you options to take care of investment opportunities. If I take out an interest-only loan, I still can make the same payments and replicate the results of a fixed-rate mortgage, but am not obligated to do so. If an investment opportunity arises, or if I simply have a cash flow shortage, I can make the interest-only payment and not default on my loan. If, instead, I had a fully amortizing loan, I lose the option to pay interest only and will lose my house if I can’t pay the difference in the interest-only loan and the fully amortizing loan.


135 posted on 08/21/2007 10:45:51 PM PDT by rebel_yell2 (iI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson