I can't wait to pay someone else's debts and bail out real estate speculators and lenders who loaned money to un-qualified marginal "buyers". /sarc
Posted on 08/21/2007 4:28:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
We always get back to the same place, don't we, whenever something goes wrong -- the place known as How Can the Government Help?
Already Democrats, without too much contradiction from nervous Republicans, are sifting ideas to help the subprime mortgage victims keep their homes despite rising mortgage costs. Denunciations of "predatory" lending practices fill the air, though I'm not aware of a single presidential candidate's having fingered specific predators -- or even having attempted to prove that predatory practices are at the bottom of the problem.
Meanwhile Hillary Clinton talks of a $1 billion federal fund to help families likely to find themselves sitting on the curb outside their former houses (or, much likelier, moving into apartments or rental houses). The New York Times on Sunday ran a poignant photo of a father and young son about to be ousted from their home.
This stuff hurts. Home ownership is, allegedly, the American dream, notwithstanding that only in recent decades have a majority of Americans actually owned their homes. Americans don't like the idea of other Americans losing homes and hopes. In which attitude there's much to applaud.
Still, the other side of the coin needs a little burnishing. Any economic system -- in particular the free market system, which is risk-based -- presupposes winners and losers. That you don't win isn't necessarily your fault. Bad luck could be responsible -- as when, in a rush of exuberance, one has borrowed a sum hard or impossible to repay, expecting, like Wilkins Micawber, that "something will turn up." But it doesn't. Now what?
Now some hurt. It sounds heartless to talk clinically of other people's hurt, which is one reason politicians come running with the balm and bandages at times like these. We've come to expect it. In a country where everyone votes, or at least can, the call for government aid is inevitable, even proper up to a point. How pleased would we be as a people if standard government practice was to judge victims of various kinds a bunch of worthless losers, unworthy of the winners among us?
The question, really, isn't whether to help; the questions are how much to help, and at what public cost. A protective layer of government "compassion" that insulates citizens from the consequences of bad choices does little for anyone but the politicians -- and in their case, only as long as their little game goes undiscovered.
Emergency relief -- food, shelter, clothes -- is one thing. Protection, as a matter of policy, from bad decisions (e.g., borrowing without the means to repay) penalizes good decisions. It says to citizens, don't bother to plan, to save, to reason things out, to act with discretion and judgment, because if you do blow it through carelessness or irrationality, along the government rescue wagon will come, bells jingling and dollars flying through the air.
When the course of least resistance works, it becomes the course increasingly preferred by the majority. Where's the incentive to make good decisions if bad decisions pay off? Pain hurts -- yes. It also toughens and strengthens, concentrates the mind wonderfully on those tasks needful to avert it in the future.
Nor are voters, generally speaking, so dumb they never figure out the ruinous consequences -- moral as well as economic -- of rigging outcomes and rewarding bad luck.
Sen. Clinton isn't talking morality -- of this kind anyway -- and she certainly isn't talking economics. She's talking politics -- the acquisition of votes through a species of bribery disguised as good old American compassion.
Blessed are the merciful, we are advised on High Authority. And cursed, in considerable degree, are those whose politicians pretend to preside over a bed of roses in which difficulties wilt away and no one gets pricked by thorns -- and if someone gets pricked anyway, his representatives in Washington will find the culprits, you bet, and make them pay. Them and everybody else around.
Someone needs to post Davy Crockett’s address to Congress when it wanted to pass a bill giving money to a war widow. He had the issue of compassion/compulsion right.
Don't make me laugh...
Yep. Demies, the “victim” party. Everybody is a victim. The more of a victim you are, the better they like you. Heck, they even have professional “victims.”
Denunciations of "predatory" lending practices fill the air, though I'm not aware of a single presidential candidate's having fingered specific predators -- or even having attempted to prove that predatory practices are at the bottom of the problem.
Probably because the bottom of the problem is greed and if the bare facts are brought to light it will reveal unethical and possibly illegal agendas on the part of individuals that are doing the finger pointing.
The Left has long had a vested interest in poverty and social malaise.
I can't wait to pay someone else's debts and bail out real estate speculators and lenders who loaned money to un-qualified marginal "buyers". /sarc
Predetory lending practices might seem good to the lender on the front-end but, if they get stuck with the property with no money coming in.......
Next, come the lawsuits.
It was laughable about a year ago when there were scores of Freepers who were employed in the real estate market who tried to tell everyone that all was well, and any talk of even a slow down in the housing market was rubbish.
There is an old adage: “Anything that is subsidized increases while anything that is taxed decreases.” If the government bails out these idiots who took out subprime loans they could not afford to repay, then more people will borrow loans they can’t repay and we will all be stuck paying the bill. More liberalism in action.
Thanks for posting “Not yours to give”.
Emergency relief -- food, shelter, clothes -- is one thing. Protection, as a matter of policy, from bad decisions (e.g., borrowing without the means to repay) penalizes good decisions. It says to citizens, don't bother to plan, to save, to reason things out, to act with discretion and judgment, because if you do blow it through carelessness or irrationality, along the government rescue wagon will come, bells jingling and dollars flying through the air.
The Hildabeaste, defined!
I feel badly for those folks who made poorly researched decisions and are now hurting. However, it was their decision to make, they made it and now they are learning a valuable lesson: actions have consequences. I do not believe my tax dollars should bail out my neighbor because he made a bad decision.
“Not yours to give” should be required reading (and frequent rereading) for every legislator in the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.