Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enchante
"WHy is the “LooseCHange” douchebag even being given air time?????? These nutters are making me ill......"

Silverstein (owner of the WTC buildings) stated that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. He's on tape saying that it was the fire department's decision to 'pull' the building. I'd guess that's what started all this conspiracy stuff.

In demolition parlance, 'pull' refers to a controlled demolition, according to the demolition experts interviewed.

66 posted on 08/20/2007 9:49:14 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound

I’ve only caught part of this doc on the History channel, but so far it seems pretty good — it does show the nutters but it seems to take care to refute every one of their idiotic points, so far as I have seen. It gives good prominence to the guy from Popular Mechanics and others who have refuted the nutters.


72 posted on 08/20/2007 9:58:43 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound
Building 7 was a controlled demolition

it takes weeks to place demolitions to bring a building down not minutes...

91 posted on 08/20/2007 10:14:49 PM PDT by mazza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound

To clear up any possible confusion, do you believe in this “controlled demolition”?


98 posted on 08/20/2007 10:20:27 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound
I'm reading Report from Ground Zero right now. This is what a couple of guys said regarding WTC7:

JOE DUNNE, First Deputy Police Commissioner (NYPD): "I saw people walking around on the street, and they all had the look of shock on their face. They were walking slowly, and many of them were walking into harm's way. They were walking south on Church Street. Many of these people were coming out of (WTC) 7, 5, and other surrounding buildings that had suffered collateral damage. In fact, at this point in time, those buildings were now on fire."

HARRY MEYERS, Assistant Chief of Department (FDNY): "We were all pretty much on board that tower 7 was going to fall. We just didn't know when or in which direction. Everybody forgets about 7, but that building was forty-seven stories, and that in itself would have been a very major event. We couldn't fight the fire in tower 7 because we didn't have enough water. All the water mains were down. What water we had was being supplied by the boats, through large-diameter hose. It would have been a chaotic situation, in any event, trying to get in there under those circumstances and fight that fire ..."

106 posted on 08/20/2007 10:31:09 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland (www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFsiZ2l2K5U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound
Larry Silverstein gave order to "pull" Building 7

What pull really means here is stop firefighting efforts in a fatally damaged and totally evacuted (civilians) building.

" In demolition parlance, 'pull' refers to a controlled demolition, according to the demolition experts interviewed."

Possibly, but when used in connection to Silverstein on the collapse of building 7 is truther BS.

118 posted on 08/20/2007 10:45:55 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound

He did not say pull the building...he said pull it, referring to the removal of the fire fighters as the building was a lost cause. The misquoting of Silverstein has been the basis for a great deal of conspiracy theories. He stated that he was referring to the firefighters on scene, as enough had died that day already.


184 posted on 08/21/2007 7:16:38 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson