Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IIntense

You are using the example of a person that accidentally causes harm to another?

That’s the best you can come up with? Are you sure you don’t wan’t to try a more emotionally charged example of something like rape of a minor or something like that?

I’m not changing my mind based on this bland example. Sorry.


97 posted on 08/20/2007 9:45:58 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre

“You are using the example of a person that accidentally causes harm to another?”

The “accidental” part ends when he runs into the hoped for protection of the petticoat sanctuary. He now is a person wanted by the law.

If this is still not acceptable to you, then could you possibly put yourself into the position of the person hit by this driver, or one of his relatives ? Would your position of sanctuary in the petticoat protection building be the same ?”


101 posted on 08/20/2007 10:12:03 PM PDT by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre
...accidentally causes harm to another?

Reckless driving itself is a crime. If it results in injuring another person, that's an additional charge.

If the victim dies due to the driver's criminal actions, he/she may be facing a manslaughter charge.

You see this scenario as boring, humdrum, not exciting enough? Geez!

Anyway, you're standing pretty much alone with your "churches can be sanctuaries for lawbreakers." It simply makes no sense.

121 posted on 08/21/2007 3:16:28 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson