Posted on 08/20/2007 3:20:51 PM PDT by Jean S
Progressive blogger Lane Hudson filed a complaint against former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) on Monday, accusing the likely presidential candidate of breaking the law by violating the Federal Election Commission’s (FEC) “testing the waters” clause.
Hudson, known for posting e-mails from former Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) in last year’s page scandal, said Thompson “has been presenting himself as a candidate, he has been raising large sums of money beyond what would be required to explore a possible candidacy and he has signed a long term lease on a headquarters for his campaign.”
In his complaint, Hudson lays out a number of examples ranging from Thompson’s extensive fundraising to quotes from the senator and his advisers.
“Fred Thompson is breaking the law and it’s time somebody did something about it,” Hudson said in a statement. “So, this morning, I filed an FEC Complaint against him. For far too long, he has been ignoring the letter and spirit of Federal Election Law for his own political benefit. It reeks of the same disregard for the law that we have seen from the Bush Administration, Bob Ney, Duke Cunningham, Tom Delay [sic], and Mark Foley.”
In an e-mail, Thompson spokesman Jim Mills said only, “We’re following the law.”
The FEC Monday afternoon could only confirm that it has received the complaint. The complaint will be treated as a “matter under review.”
Within five days of receiving the complaint, the FEC must notify the Thompson exploratory committee and provide it with a copy of the complaint. The committee then has 15 days to respond to the FEC and say in writing “why no action should be taken.”
A number of press reports have raised questions about the extent of Thompson’s early efforts and whether they run afoul of the “testing the waters” clause.
The law is particularly vague in this area as there are no set dollar amounts a would-be candidate is prevented from raising. Thompson’s $3.4 million June haul as outlined in a report to the IRS does not meet or exceed any specific legal guideline.
Thompson has raised what, $4 million. And it takes $200 million to run. The blogger has no clue.
Call a whaaaaabulance?
What is a “progressive blogger”?? Does he gradually blog?
Lets file an FEC complaint about the blogger giving something of value to the DNC and not declaring it...
*grin*
I am sure that this blogger raised similar issues when Hillary was using Air Force One to run for the senate, or when she was raising money for a denied future Presidential run, while she is senator from her home state of Illinois, er, Arkansas, oh wait, New York.
need I really add: /sarchasim
The dork is a DUphile in RINO clothes.
>>Lets file an FEC complaint about the blogger giving something of value to the DNC and not declaring it...
*grin*<<
That would be funny as hell. Sadly my principles prevent me from doing it, but it would be funny as hell.
>>The dork is a DUphile in RINO clothes.<<
This guy claims to be a Republican?!
“Progressive” blogger?? What a pile of horse manure. That’s a “left wing scandal mongering” blogger.
It’s August. Gnats fly thick this time of year.
So Thompson needs “official” permission to speak? While I find that reprehesible and anti-First Amendment, it is somehow poetic justice that one of the people who pushed the McCain-Feingold Law now runs afoul of campaign laws that restrict free speech. (I know it is garbage, he is almost certainly within the law and this probably will lead to nothing - but it is poetic justice nevertheless).
more:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1883933/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1883933/posts
(more spin)
.
.
That's good.
Oh, puh-leeze! Can’t they just let surfing dogs lie?
JK, great video!!!
Which one was "Moondoggie"?
Lane???? snickers
i say hit the ROAD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.