Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman
You say don’t underestimate their abilities, I say, don’t overestimate them. If Mitt was President for 8 years it would mean, for one thing, that Mormonism correctly took a back seat in his administration in at least the first 4, or he wouldn’t get reelected. And if Mitt was President for 8 years, I’m pretty sure that the total number of Mormons in the US at the end of those 8 years wouldn’t be much different than if he hadn’t been president for those 8 years.

OK. How can I say this any clearer? I spent the last post making a number of distinctions between the Romney campaign and Salt Lake City PRsters & its proseltyzing program. The "abilities" referred to the latter, not the former. I'm not talking about a would-be ROMNEY ADMINISTRATION when it comes to my comments about PR and proselytizing campaigns!!!! Since you seemingly still don't "get it," to put it another way, I'm not talking about what would happen in the Beltway!!! (It's what would be mounted outside the Beltway that would be of concern).

336 posted on 08/23/2007 10:05:43 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian
I'm not talking about a would-be ROMNEY ADMINISTRATION when it comes to my comments about PR and proselytizing campaigns!!!!
Then your comments are pretty much irrelevant in regards to this thread, which is all about the Romney candidacy for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and the role of Mormonism in that candidacy and, if applicable, subsequent Presidency.

Do you have any RELEVANT comments on the subject?

337 posted on 08/23/2007 10:08:09 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson