Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MCH
The Air Force' argument is actually ridiculous. Does the AF have to go to Army and/or the Marines to be issued a sidearm and/or ammunition for it? Of course not!

So why should the Air Force have complete control over all assets that fly?

They shouldn't.

22 posted on 08/19/2007 8:22:16 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Babu

Having spent a year in country as a Bde FSO, y’all are 0 mils. The worst thing in the world is to turn anything over to the Air Force. Their O-6s are just scared that they will be put out of the ISR business forever by an Army / USMC E-4.
By the way, if you want to check out the Air Force’s worst nightmare, look up Guided MLRS and 155mm Excalibur. No 3 day ATO, no e-mailing the CAOC for permission, no “Bingo fuel, so sorry”. Just another good fire mission and dead Ts.


25 posted on 08/19/2007 8:30:19 PM PDT by redlegplanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Babu; centurion316; redlegplanner

Having worked around USAF guys carrying guns around (and having been one myself), it MIGHT be a good idea. And in fact, USAF folks going into ground roles go to the US Army for training in using sidearms and M4s before deploying.

But I’ve watched BN/CCs bicker over who gets what air asset when in reality they were just about 20 miles apart - so the right (read that USAF answer) is that whoever had a need AT THE TIME should get the assets. Fortunately, both BDE & Division understood that...


28 posted on 08/19/2007 8:32:57 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson