Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds' Porn Ultimatum
NY Post ^ | August 19, 2007 | By JANON FISHER

Posted on 08/19/2007 6:21:50 PM PDT by ellery

Ron Jeremy, Jenna Jameson - get ready to stand and be counted.

The Department of Justice wants to come up with an official list of every porn star in America - and slap stiff penalties on producers who don't cooperate.

The new rules, proposed under the Adam Walsh Child Safety and Protection Act, would require blue-movie makers to keep photos, stage names, professional names, maiden names, aliases, nicknames and ages on file for the inspection of the department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.

"The identity of every performer is critical to determining and ensuring that no performer is a minor," according to the new proposal.

The adult film industry plans to challenge the new rule as a violation of the First Amendment, said Paul Cambria, a lawyer for Hustler and other adult film companies.

He sees it as a way to harass legitimate stag-film producers.

"If they can't get you for obscenity, they'll get you for violating record-keeping," he said. Such a violation would carry a five-year penalty.

The proposed rule would require porn producers to give the title of the video or magazine, or the Web address where the actor appears.

The Department of Justice has shown some sensitivity for the performers' privacy, however. All information not essential to proving their age and identity, like phone numbers and addresses, can be withheld.

Distributors of foreign pornography aren't off the hook - they must still produce a copy of the foreign actor's identification card. The department estimates that there are 500,000 Web sites, 200 DVD producers and 5,000 businesses nationwide that would be subject to the new rule.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; doj; firstamendment; govwatch; porn; pornography; pr0n; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-262 next last
To: Perdogg
I am not sure what the problem is. It just requires that film makers keep records available for inspection.

It's the same as tracking guns: only the law-abiding will comply. Criminals will continue to break the law more than ever, while legitimate parties get snagged on BS "technicalities".

41 posted on 08/19/2007 6:45:05 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule
Ron Jeremy was on Fox News resently with a minister that he is traveling around with where the minister and him discuss the good/bad effects of porn.

What a waste. They could have done that by using one person

Her "working name" was Bambi Bridges.

Gene Scott sure knew how to pick em!

42 posted on 08/19/2007 6:46:22 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ellery

The adult industry has already done an excellent job in policing themselves. This is typical of big government under the guise of moral values, the type espoused by the likes of Mike Huckabee and Sam Brownback.


43 posted on 08/19/2007 6:47:44 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FearlessFreep; Billthedrill
In accordance with long-standing generally-accepted FReeper practices...


44 posted on 08/19/2007 6:48:15 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger
Say what you will about the NY Post, but they come up with some entertaining headlines.

And check out Jenna's pic caption: "She'd be in the head count"

45 posted on 08/19/2007 6:48:36 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The people who comply with the new rules will be forced out of business on comma, punctuation, and minor record keeping snarls just like FFL holders.

This act protects the people who work illegally by chopping the more moderate producers into a bureaucracy grinder. Offshore producers benefit the most.

Market demand won't go down, but legit producers will.

46 posted on 08/19/2007 6:49:07 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Egad. I don't think she's 15 anymore...

Mind you, I read about this whole thing in the newspapers. In the Christian Science Reading room. Uh...when I was studying in the seminary. Yeah, that's it...

47 posted on 08/19/2007 6:50:01 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FearlessFreep
Jenna looks ill.

She may need a dose of Dr. Molemans secret searum :-)

48 posted on 08/19/2007 6:50:05 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Her pic graced many a barracks wall during my younger days.


49 posted on 08/19/2007 6:51:56 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger; snarks_when_bored

“She’d be in head count”, I should’ve written.


50 posted on 08/19/2007 6:53:12 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

I don’t know why they limit themselves to First Amendment arguments.

They also have freedom of assembly, privacy, commerce, life/liberty/pursuit of happiness..... all of that.


51 posted on 08/19/2007 6:53:21 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord; fkabuckeyesrule
Her "working name" was Bambi Bridges.

Gene Scott sure knew how to pick em!

Talk about a blast from the past! I just had to check the link, and was particularly struck by this entry in her bio: "A natural linguist, she is intellectually unbiased toward the Gospel"...

52 posted on 08/19/2007 6:53:28 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I don't really understand the purpose and how it differs from 2257.
53 posted on 08/19/2007 6:54:04 PM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ellery

More stupidity from the government AKA Big Brother.


54 posted on 08/19/2007 6:54:55 PM PDT by packrat35 (PIMP my Senate. They're all a bunch of whores anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord

Have you ever listened to Melissa Scott teach from the scriptures? Do you believe Jesus saves? Well, if you can get a trickle of the Spirit power God has graced her with, you might even not make such smarmy posts!


55 posted on 08/19/2007 6:56:28 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Obscenity is NOT free speech! If porn producers don't like the record-keeping rules, then they're free to pursue another line of business. There's no right in the Constitution to produce obscene material.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

56 posted on 08/19/2007 6:56:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

LOL, I was thinking some of Doc Freep’s 2 ball ointment.


57 posted on 08/19/2007 6:57:14 PM PDT by FearlessFreep (Educated beyond my intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Even the first pic is completely different from her earlier days.


58 posted on 08/19/2007 6:58:50 PM PDT by FearlessFreep (Educated beyond my intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
forced out of business

Which is exactly what a certain constituency desires. This is politics after all.

Offshore

Off course, to places where it's completely unregulated and there are no limits to the sleaze. And that same material will become available in the US by means of -- let's call them black and grey market channels.

So, let's review. The porn will get sleazier. People (including kids) will still access it. But at least puritanical pols will score a few political points. All IMMHO!

59 posted on 08/19/2007 7:02:19 PM PDT by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ellery
First we go to war to defeat the Taliban in a far-away country, then we decide to re-create it here.

Just like what happened in the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

60 posted on 08/19/2007 7:04:44 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson