Posted on 08/19/2007 2:36:54 PM PDT by doug from upland
NOTE: After asking an embarrassing question of Rudy Giuliani (on behalf of her newphew), our friend Katherine Prudhomme O'Brien was called a professional on Good Morning American by the Clintonista and fake journalist George Stephanopoulos. In an attempt to marginalize her and make her look nuts, he also false claimed that she has confronted Bill Clinton. We are hoping that sometime during the campaign, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Katherine are going to be able to confront Hillary. When Katherine asked her face to face a few weeks ago if she believed Juanita Broaddrick, Hillary said she didn't know who that was.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
August 25, 2000: Embarrass Clinton-Gore, get a call from the IRS By KATHERINE PRUDHOMME
Thursday, Aug. 16, 2007
The New Hampshire Union Leader published the following op-ed column by Katherine Prudhomme seven years ago.
Sometimes, people use a joke as a way to test drive a worst case scenario. They will say just what they're thinking -- but in the form of a joke, so they don't sound too paranoid.
My friends have all been joking with me that I'm going to be audited because last year I asked Al Gore at a televised Derry town hall meeting if he believed Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who said she was raped in 1978 by Bill Clinton. Gore responded he hadn't seen the television interview with Broaddrick, and said he'd forgiven Clinton for his "mistakes."
When I told my friends that I led a protest of Hillary Rodham Clinton's silence on the Broaddrick charge outside her New York City Senate campaign headquarters last Saturday (I was in New York anyway to celebrate my birthday with my mom and my sister), they joked that my phone would be tapped.
Nonetheless, the issues of crime, rape and abuse of women are important to New Yorkers, and I don't want voters down there to get the same kind of bad answer from Mrs. Clinton that I got from Gore.
So I presented her staff with the videotape of the interview that Broaddrick gave to "Dateline NBC." I not only gave the tape to Mrs. Clinton's staffer (who refused to tell me his name), I also sent it to her via certified mail. She can no longer conveniently say she does not know who Broaddrick is or say to anyone (as Gore said to me), "What show was it on? No, I haven't seen it."
At that town hall meeting, Gore -- running against Bill Bradley for the Democratic Presidential nomination at the time -- told me he didn't know how to evaluate Broaddrick's claim. (How was Anita Hill's claim any different?) He said that if Clinton has made mistakes, he should be forgiven. (Oh? Is rape a "mistake?")
Worst of all, Gore said the American people want to move on. He said that to me as if I were somehow apart from the American people since I didn't want to "move on."
Mrs. Clinton has plans to attend an award ceremony soon honoring those who are fighting for justice by tracking down the rightful owners of property stolen from Jews during the Holocaust. That property was stolen a long time ago.
If the Clintons and Gore are so eager to "move on," why bother looking back more than half a century to right such a terrible wrong? Apparently Mrs. Clinton thinks some things are worth going back to and rectifying.
Now back to the joke. I got a letter from the Internal Revenue Service last Friday. The IRS wants me to send it some forms about my 1998 tax return of $1,500. Why, two years later, have they decided to send me this? My taxes went through just fine when I sent them in over a year ago.
Unlike Hillary Clinton, I'm not going to cry "vast conspiracy" the first time something bugs me. But people should know the truth: All the women who have spoken out against Bill Clinton's dishonorable behavior -- Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, and Kathleen Willey -- are all being audited or investigated by the IRS.What are the chances that is a coincidence?
The real story here is how the Clinton-Gore machine (including Mrs. Clinton) wants to edit the Broaddrick rape claim out of existence. They will not tolerate any questions on the subject.
Our country was once up in arms over a few minutes of missing tape during the Watergate scandal, and yet no one seems concerned Clinton refuses to admit where he was on the date in question (April 25, 1978). NBC reported he had no public appearances that morning, so it's possible he was in Little Rock, in that hotel room with Juanita Broaddrick -- just as she claims.
When WCBM Washington correspondent Les Kinsolving asked White House press secretary Joe Lockhart about Broaddrick's claim, Lockhart answered him with another question. Lockhart asked him if he knew where the door was.
Let's hope New Yorkers have better luck getting an answer about Broaddrick from Mrs. Clinton than White House correspondents have had with President Clinton.
To Hillary and/or all of her thugs reading FR today, I want it to be known that FReeper “Does so” alerted me to the story. :)
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Juanita Broaddrick, Another American, invisible to Hillary.
I have listened to Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones, they are believable. I am neither a judge nor a jury and Clinton the rapist should be thankful for that.
I have heard of Elizabeth Ward Gracen but am not familiar with her story. Is she another Clinton rape victim?
Is there a statute of limitations for rape?
I posted something about Hillary being a rapist enabler and got an AIM response of being a “retard.” This person also called Bill Clinton the “best president.” I could not respond to this person because they signed off. Just one more coward who ran away...
There is a statute of limitations on rape. Bill and Hillary have not commented on it personally because, I believe, if they publicly called her a liar, she may have the ability to file a civil suit and compel testimony. The Clintons don’t want any part of that. They know those wearing the Clinton kneepads will allow them to get away with silence.
Elizabeth Ward Gracen, former Miss America, originally said the President forced himself upon her. The Clintons made sure she got an acting job out of the country so she would not be around for questions. Judy Stokes, a friend of Elizabeth, claims that Clinton kept hitting on her in the back seat of a limo, until she finally gave in and had sex with the future president.
Sorry. Stephanopoulos called her a PROFESSIONAL HECKLER. When I spoke with her yesterday, she was really upset by that.
Barrett Report. No Congresscritters are willing to touch it. That itself raises questions about who would be damaged the most by the revelation
I understand that a congressman is allowed to go in and view the entire report and there is no prohibition about telling what he finds. I have asked my congressman to do that for me.
They just don’t want to hear it, do they? They don’t want to face it that a serial sexual predator was allowed to roam the White House. It would shatter their world view that they allowed it and just sat back.
?? Is he a Klintoon supporter? Or just incredibly embarrassed about it... ?
What’s the latest Doug? Can not wait to see and hear what they say in court next!!!
Oral arguments before the Appellate Court on Sept. 7. If Kendall wins and she stays out as a defendant, discovery will begin quickly. If he loses, he may well go to the California Suprement Court. That won’t take a great deal of time. The timing may be right for some damage to her before the California primary absentee voting begins on Jan. 7.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.