Replies

Okay, I’m going to write out some warnings here before yon posters go making fools of themselves.

First, I am a true crime buff and write extensively about it on my Blog. Not that I’m necessarily proud of that but been intrigued by the subject since a young woman.

Right here and now, first rule of True crime 101, you have the NY Times on a mission. Defense lawyers often go on a mission and distort and twist the facts. So too does a biased media.

If you believe that this crime came down in the matter that it is presented in this article, then I’ve a bridge in Brookly to sell you right cheap. Two signs that should make you go “hmmmm”. First, if a defense lawyer is the source. Second, if it’s in the NY Times and they’re somehow, however a stretch, blaming the military. It is defense lawyers who are giving this story to the NY Times so right there, two strikes.

We don’t know how this crime happened. One could, and if I were doing a Blog post on this I would, look up more details on the crime. We don’t know if this woman was murdered outside then drug back in to her apartment after she was already dead. Evidently this was some sort of gang thing and open your mind. Gang rapes and murders are all the rage. Just recently four young people were killed execution style in Neward NJ. Shortly before this, a family was brutally terrorized in Connecticut by two Amos and Andy crooks who got carried away by the moment. Down south in Florida way, TEN cheap adolescent thugs raped a woman and brutalized her son.

Gangs of thugs act crazy is what I’m saying here. This murder sounds like this very thing. I can almost guarantee that further investigation into the facts will reveal things not revealed in the article.

I read the story about how that first guy was supposed to be on a ship, how absolutely certain this ONE person was that he was on board the ship. Reading on, my, how convenient that the paperwork to prove this has been destroyed. Seriously, does anyone really destroy paperwork anymore? Don’t they have cards or things you just swipe and an electronic record is created? Which is another clue for you true crime buffs learning the ropes. Once you read that records to prove an alibi have been destroyed, get suspicious. Sure, it happens. It’s also very convenient. It’s also very convenient that only ONE fellow on this entire planet saw this perp on the ship that night. What, no one else was on the ship?

They’re LYING to you. I know you find it hard to believe that the NY Times would lie. Whatever you do, don’t leave your common sense at home. The true story is out there. There’s details of the trial. A jury somewhere listened to all the facts. A jury found these people guilty. Because of the many participants in this crime, there’s been several prosecutors involved in this. Are you going to tell me the jury and prosecutors got it all wrong and only the perps and their defense lawyers have the story straight?

They HOPE you will read just what they present and they hope you will get angry and do their bidding. If enough fools believe, maybe we’ll get a new trial, maybe the perps will walk, maybe the defense lawyers will wrack up nice attorney fees. Maybe the NY Times will make the military look stupid.

Way I figger, if all these ex-military men are so ready to confess to crimes what with their training in the military teaching them to confess to crimes they did not commit, hey if I was a prosecutor I’d go out and find me some ex-military guys first time an unsolved crime happens in my area. I’d get them in the interview room and boom, they confess quick, no problem. There should never be an unsolved crime anywhere in this country, my goodness.

I don’t believe a word of this thing but I’m not going to bother checking it out. All these people confessed and a jury convicted them.

Hey, I can take any crime of this century and write up an article that, with the right slant and by leaving out enough detail, boom I can make anybody look innocent.

I’m done and don’t intend to comment any more. Believe what you want.