[philman_36]

It’s your premise, YOU prove it.
No it isn't. It's the author's. It should be your job to disprove what the author is saying in the article if you don't believe what has been written.
Throwing out some stupid, pathetic .jpg hardly does that.
And if you'll look at the change of tune in #164 you'll note that it was hyperbole.

[Petronski]

It should be your job to disprove what the author is saying in the article if you don't believe what has been written.

No, it should not. I cannot prove a negative.

If you agree with the premise, prove it. If you do not agree with the premise, do not prove it.

But with a premise so ludicrous, don't expect anything from me but the ridicule it so richly deserves.