Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mobile Vulgus
This has nothing to do with the ‘wife’ controversy, but have you all wondered why Einstein didn’t get a Nobel Prize for his work on relativity?

Perhaps his contributions were not as impressive as the Einstein pushers would have us believe?

42 posted on 08/19/2007 9:34:23 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Born to Conserve
have you all wondered why Einstein didn’t get a Nobel Prize for his work on relativity?

No. We know why and it isn't at all as you imply.

45 posted on 08/19/2007 9:58:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Born to Conserve
Theoretical Physics accomplishments never get Nobel prizes!
It’s considered a form of Mathematics by the Nobel committee.
Alfred Nobel purposely set up his “prize” for “practical science”, practical in the sense it had to directly benefit mankind. (Of course “practical & beneficial “ as he defined “practical & beneficial”. Why not? It was his money!) The Physics prizes are all some form of Experimental Physics. The idea being experiments & the results are "practical"!)
For example, Steve Hawkings has never won a Noble Prize and John Nash’s Nobel Prize was in Economics not Mathematics ! [Game Theory (Non-cooperative game theory, I think ?) as applied to economics. ]
The Mathematics rough equivalent of the Nobel Prize is the Fields Medal. I have no idea what the Field Medal criteria is or is work in Theoretical Physics even eligible. Also I don't think the Fields Medal is as lucrative.
51 posted on 08/19/2007 10:40:58 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson