Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bill1952
That’s not an absurdity.

A doctor who is able to, would, in an emergency situation.

They won’t in non-emergency situations because of the contractual agreement they and their patients have entered into both with the regulatory agencies and with the insurance companies.

This helps to prevent the “dabbler” or “jack of all trades” trying to do something he can’t do as well as a specialist and causing even worse problems.

46 posted on 08/19/2007 7:37:15 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Any doctor who cannot or is not allowed, to set a fracture of the hand in a non emergency situation is an absurdity.

There is literally no emergency declaration in your hand being broken in three places, it just means you can’t use it, and that is not life threatening, hence contrary to your point, it will not be set period, until you locate such a doctor and get seen.

Of course the fact that your hand will be crippled for life due to loss of function is not an “emergency” either.

Even the fact that you believe that such inaction is okay-fine shows that the system is not only broken, but is the very epitome of absurdity.

54 posted on 08/19/2007 7:59:17 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson