Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chuck54

I loved Rove’s line to Chris during that exchange “you’re acting as an agent for Leahy and Waxman.” (or was it Conyers and Waxman?)

It effectively shut down that line of inquiry and Chris had to move on, defeated. Most of the time Karl succeeded by refusing to accept the premise of the question, which were all bogus. That’s what has driven me nuts about this administration, they’ve been far to willing to engage the enemy on their terms. Rove recast the argument and won almost every exchange.

This also came out in the discussion of Rove “attacking an opponent on their strengths.” Rove pointed out that sometimes you look at what someone claims is their strength and you actually find it a weakness and that by pointing out that the person was lying or exaggerating you can win. His example was Kerry trying to claim his military experience qualified him to be commander in chief yet when you look at his real record on defense issues leadership in wartime was actually a big weakness for the french one. Wallace tried to go back to his original premise and phrasing and Karl stopped him and explained it again, in small words. Chris moved on to his next line of attack.


329 posted on 08/19/2007 9:53:23 AM PDT by Phsstpok (When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok

Chris was really off his game with Rove. Let me rethink that. Chris doesn’t really have a game when interviewing someone as quick as Rove.

I’m Tivoing the 6PM recast of this and will watch it a bit closer. Chris was really, really outmatched and that is an excellent analysis about Rove not dodging any question but giving it the premise it should be given and taking old Chris apart. He and David Gregory are probably somewhere commiserating over a beer; or ten.

Can’t wait for the replay.


336 posted on 08/19/2007 10:04:32 AM PDT by Chuck54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok
....It effectively shut down that line of inquiry and Chris had to move on, defeated. Most of the time Karl succeeded by refusing to accept the premise of the question, which were all bogus.That's what has driven me nuts about this administration, they've been far to willing to engage the enemy on their terms. Rove recast the argument and won almost every exchange.

We get it, now we have to re-translate how to fight the Dems to our Pubbie politico brethren and we are home free.

337 posted on 08/19/2007 10:06:39 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok
I loved Rove’s line to Chris during that exchange “you’re acting as an agent for Leahy and Waxman.” (or was it Conyers and Waxman?)

It effectively shut down that line of inquiry and Chris had to move on, defeated. Most of the time Karl succeeded by refusing to accept the premise of the question, which were all bogus.

This confirms my suspicion that the whole "New Tone" was W's idea.

Don't be surprised if Rove disappears from the news magazine shows. The Drive-By Media will attempt to bury him in obscurity.

368 posted on 08/19/2007 1:03:43 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("A person's a person no matter how small." -Dr. Seuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson