"Well, we're at a crossroads in many respects, and we're going to do what many other generations have done, and that is come together, for a change, and solve them. You know, the things that we hold most dear, that is our safety, our very survival, certainly our economic well being, is at stake, with regard not only to our own families but with regard to future generations. There’s nothing that could be more serious than the things that this generation is going to face and are already facing."
Do you find that deep, insightful or motivational?
Do you find it disturbing that his first impulse is always towards "bipartisanship.?
Actually, you have me at a disadvantage here. Our host has made it clear that he doesn't want me going down this path.
And so, most of your above posts are going to go without reply from me, even though they very much deserve it.
Your promotion of your candidate will mostly have to go on with only the benefit of dishonest attacks from these liberal candidates' supporters, and rah-rahs from a bunch of yes-men.
>>>>>What a load.
Dumping Roe v Wade and returning the abortion issue to the states will save the lives of millions of unborn children. That's not a load, its the truth. Once we get rid of Roe we can work on getting that Human LIfe amendment which Ronald Reagan wanted.
I find Fred Thompson to be a good change of pace. Both from what we've had in the last 6-1/2 years and the eight years prior to that. He may not run around agitating everyone, causing a ruckus like Keyes does, but Thompson is a conservative. After the dog days of August are over, we'll be getting down to the nitty gritty. Neither of us like any of the top tier candidates, Giuliani, Romney or McCain. FredT is a good alternative.
If Giuliani gets the nomination, we'll both be voting for a third party candidate. And the GOP will be on the verge of destruction.
That's a mischaracterization. A presidential candidate who doesn't talk about uniting people might as well stay home.