Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asparagus

It is also worth noting, the homosexual advocats are using the legal argument of polygamy vs “just two”.

They are using the “winning with words” guru Professor Lackoff’s spin of saying “its about two consenting adults wanting to live together in love”. (IOW Marriage does not include children BTW)

Marriage has also been a federal issue in immigration. While other nations allow for polygamy AND homosexual marriage, long before the 1996 DMA the immigration service (INS then and USCIS now) did not allow such federal recognition. That was mere federal regulation!


30 posted on 08/18/2007 11:32:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
It is also worth noting, the homosexual advocats are using the legal argument of polygamy vs “just two”.

Ignoring the fact that the magic number in marriage isn't two, but one. ONE man and ONE woman. A "marriage" with two women and no man is even further removed from normalcy than a marriage with two women and one man; at least the latter has the right number of men.

96 posted on 08/19/2007 11:02:06 AM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson