Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Such a position is workable on many, many important issues.

In fact it's not and Mr. Madison was quite clear where that power was intended to lie. If we were to believe your premise about the Framers, their intent was to force all the states to accept New England Puritanism (which in fact wasn't the case)

That's why we have a Bill of Rights.

That's great. Course the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the separate and sovereign states until the 20th century and that took a SCOTUS packed with Progressives to divine that. Course that's what today's Republicans really are. Political descendants of early 20th century busybodies.

Of course next you'll start quoting from one of the first secessionist documents on this continent as if that proves your position...

100 posted on 08/19/2007 11:22:16 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: billbears

So, you think states have the right to ignore/alienate inalienable rights. Why exactly do we have a federal union again, then?


101 posted on 08/19/2007 11:23:51 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: billbears

Under your formulation, do states have the right to outlaw free speech? Ban all guns? Do away with free assembly and freedom of worship? Why not, if they have the right to abrogate the preemininent right, the right to life?


102 posted on 08/19/2007 11:27:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson