Posted on 08/18/2007 8:47:50 AM PDT by dennisw
No you, your all important petty little self should revel in the fact that Americans would lose their jobs to people in a corrupt natiion like Mexico.
I thought so....
I resent that. (It's not like the Mexicans use the novellas of Justinian as the basis for their legal system.)
And then they go on to detail how he has acculturated himself to the ways of Mexican corruption.
Mr. Haverty may have to leave town soon. Or talk to some of those Lockheed guys about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
And our nation can deteriorate futher.
Sounds great.
They may have to stand in line behind Norfolk Southern, which has a number of ties to KCS. There would also be fewer antitrust concerns.
This has nothing to do with American jobs. But, of course, there aren’t American jobs just like an American trade deficit is a figment of one’s imagination, too. There are just a bunch of wannabes who are not employers trying to lay claim to rights they are not entitled to. I think it would be nice if he would put a cattle car on the end of every Mexico-Canadian bound train so illegals could go straight to Canada.
>All this talk of lost union jobs has given me an erection.<
Statement: You sound as if you are queer.
Fact: You are a disgusting person.
So what happens when it’s all built and the myriad Chi-Coms’ problems — not the least of which is the restless stirrings of the Party’s Maoists (Marxists) — cause it all to come tumbling down, either by revolution or by Maoists taking the Party back from the corrupt Dengists then seizing all useful idiots’ property and pulling that Bamboo Curtain shut?
Can’t happen?
I applaud this effort to lower costs and increase efficiency. We will see lower prices for imported goods and increased efficiency and lower labor costs on the west coast ports because of the increased competition. We desperately need competition for the union thugs who control the west coast ports. Union monopolies are worse than corporate monopolies because we have anti trust laws to deal with corporate monopolies. Union monopolists enjoy broad support by the Democrats and little opposition by the Republicans.
Obviously, controls on illegal immigration must by established. With political will, illegal immigration should not be a problem because of this transportation corridor. Increased illegal immigration is not a direct result of this transportation corridor. Increases in illegal immigration will be a result of a lack of political will, not a result of investment in this transportation corridor.
And I’m not a queer.
I also think it’s good.
Bump.
**The Mexican government still owns the land under KCS’ rails south of the border and can revoke its concession at any time.**
Should call it the San Sebastian Line.
You sound like a broken record. Unionism in the private sector is way down IOW you are hallucinating. Save your anger for Government unions. They have no competition
So basically, it’s a rail line to ship Chinese junk from Mexico to the north?
Maybe they should start a copper mine, too.
It will be a race to see if the port/railway gets finished before the US Dollar tanks so bad we won't be able to afford so much ChiCom crap
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.