While I agree with that statement, it leads me to ponder which president would be worse for the Republican party and conservative movement, Hillary, or pick your favorite RINO.
I’m 51 years old, and I’ve never seen anything energize and motivate the conservative movement like the Clinton presidency. I think if Hillary were elected...as horrifying as that thought is...she would put more strength into the conservative movement than anyone since Ronald Reagan. As opposed someone who is supposedly on “our side,” selling us out at every turn.
Nothing takes the juice out of a political movement like our own leadership cutting our legs out from under us.
We’ve seen too much of that lately.
Perhaps a shred of truth in that.
But it would be energized conservatives more than several billion dollars short and more than a decade or 3 too late.
Not REMOTELY worth the risk.
The is horridly bad news—as in maximum evil news. She’ll rush us into globalism at the speed of light. The RINOs would at least be slower.
And, that logic . . . is a bit like the logic that “this country needs another 911 only worse”
in order to wake up and save itself.
Some truth in that . . . however . . . NOT to be sought nor risked if there’s any means to prevent it.