1 posted on
08/16/2007 6:50:51 PM PDT by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
Obviously, he didn’t write it.. therefore I’ll take his word for it, better yet, I’ll take his record.
2 posted on
08/16/2007 6:54:22 PM PDT by
xcamel
("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: Plutarch
As if the second position paper would be acceptable to the pro-death folks.
3 posted on
08/16/2007 6:54:34 PM PDT by
tdewey10
(Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
To: jellybean
4 posted on
08/16/2007 6:56:31 PM PDT by
xcamel
("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: Plutarch
Pro-life page: a full page, point after point
“Pro-choice page:” two pathetic spinagraphs.
7 posted on
08/16/2007 6:59:16 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
To: Plutarch
You’re doing great work debunking the laughable spin of scumbag Jake Tapper. Thanks.
8 posted on
08/16/2007 7:00:30 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
To: Plutarch
I don’t read this as him taking two different positions at all. These two papers are entirely consistent with one another. What the notations at the top probably indicate is which groups should RECEIVE each paper. They would send the first paper to pro-life groups and the 2nd paper to pro-choice groups.
Obviously, he wouldn’t want to stress his “strong pro-life voting record” to the pro-choice groups, but it is telling that he didn’t say anything on the pro-choice paper that isn’t also on the pro-life paper.
Politicians do this all the time. It’s like creating a marketing plan - send this letter to one group and this letter to another. As long as the letters don’t contradict each other (these don’t) then there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it.
To: Plutarch
ABC cares about abortion?
Nah, they must have a different agenda.
11 posted on
08/16/2007 7:08:09 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: Plutarch
There are no two position this is one paper back to back on on sheet you can see the print bleed through on the copy.
I really hate it when the media is deceptive or misleading.
This looks like a detail document on Fred Thompson position on abortion of being pro life!
14 posted on
08/16/2007 7:32:20 PM PDT by
restornu
(Teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
To: Plutarch
...or more accurately, he/she said.
19 posted on
08/16/2007 7:50:30 PM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
To: Plutarch
Jake Tapper:
23 posted on
08/16/2007 8:24:51 PM PDT by
iowamark
To: Plutarch
Are you saying that Fred Thompson has TWO positions to the right of where your pathetic candidate, Mitt, is NOW? even after his phony conversion?
24 posted on
08/16/2007 8:42:36 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: Plutarch
Bookmarked.
Beyond that, Senator Thompson has said that the federal government should not be involved in the issue of abortion. He does not believe that early-term abortions should be criminalized. He feels instead that this is a battle that must be won in the hearts and minds of the American people.
42 posted on
08/17/2007 10:15:06 AM PDT by
Gelato
(... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
