To "protect the price of corn" the Brits allowed a government administrator to disallow the import of food for starving people.
I think the CARE administrator who came up with that argument should be dealt with roughly and sent away.
But in this case, the Kenyan’s are not experiencing a famine due to a disease afflicting their primary foodstuff. The influx of unneeded (by Americans) U.S. wheat DOES negatively impact the Kenyan agricultural sector and thus their economy in general. Furthermore, it’s a perpetuating cycle that will not easily allow the Kenyans (and other 3rd world countries) to improve their standard of living.
No one can compete with free so free has to be used carefully or you create the very situation you are trying to remedy.
From the article: “Other experts said they share CARE’s concern, but stressed that food donations are sometimes needed when a natural disaster harms a local area’s agriculture, such as the flooding that North Korea says has devastated vast tracts of its farmland.
The Atlanta-based CARE agreed with that view. “We are not against emergency food aid for things like drought and famine,” spokeswoman Alina Labrada said Thursday.”
The CARE administrator echoes your idea about famines and disasters.
it clearly said that the problem is different in a famine situation where local agriculture is devestated. In that case food aid is nessecary