To: CSM
When actual harm can be proven, then the harmed party should be given protection. See how simple that is...See the statement from PH in my post (43 or 45?) Are you going to argue with the manufacturer of the product on the danger?
If you can't tell the difference between popcorn/fireplace and a cigarette, you're a moron not worth discussing anything further with. Please go back to sucking your cancer stick and leave reasoning to the adults. Thanks ;)
320 posted on
08/20/2007 2:08:20 PM PDT by
mbraynard
(FDT: Less Leadership Experience than any president in US history)
To: mbraynard; CSM
If you can't tell the difference between popcorn/fireplace and a cigarette, you're a moron not worth discussing anything further with.I've never seen moron CSM end a sentence with a preposition, and that second-hand popcorn smoke will kill you.
Is butter flavoring ruining popcorn workers' lungs?
To: mbraynard
329 posted on
08/20/2007 8:32:28 PM PDT by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: mbraynard
“leave reasoning to the adults.”
And that absolutely flies in the face of what you have advocated in this thread. Instead, you want to eliminate reasoning by government edict and cancel the voices of the adults involved in the scenario.
335 posted on
08/21/2007 6:20:23 AM PDT by
CSM
("The real question is, why donÂ’t we hate them?" - Veto! (8/9/2007))
To: mbraynard
Are you going to argue with the manufacturer of the product on the danger?News flash; tobacco companies lie for money.
337 posted on
08/21/2007 9:33:59 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
