[mbraynard]

I guess that's why you haven't cited any directly. Three of them that were first.... all backed what I said. I quoted from them. You've never done that.

And I keep repeating myself - did any of them involve children? Bueller? Bueller? I have answered every stupid question I've gotten in this whole discussion from a bunch of substance abusers projecting their own self-loathing of their inability to kick the habbit. But you can't answer ONE of mine - a very simple one for someone who supposedly has 'read studies' (*cough*BS*cough*)

[Wheee The People]

Don’t ask him to produce a “peer reviewed” study. That would be hate speech.

[Just another Joe]

But you can't answer ONE of mine - a very simple one for someone who supposedly has 'read studies' (*cough*BS*cough*)

What question have you asked me that I haven't answered?
I will do my best to give you my answer.

[Just another Joe]

Three of them that were first.... all backed what I said. I quoted from them. You've never done that.

I cited the Relative Risk from them.
That's normally what you look for in a epidemiological study.

People can say what they want from their own agenda, the RR is done from the numbers.