[mbraynard]

Ok, you didn't do me the courtesy of a link. I had to look them up myself. I read the first three (not all 43). All of them stated - and I quoted them back to you - conclusions that agreed with me. I also told you none of them involved children.

Let me ask you - did you READ all 43 of them? Do you have a pubmed subscription? How do you know 80% of them don't meet a standard if you didn't read them? That's a lot of work - something only a paid researcher would take the time to do.

[Eric Blair 2084]

Let’s start from the beginning. Do you think that an RR of 1.25 means a 25% risk elevation?

[Just another Joe]

Let me ask you - did you READ all 43 of them? Do you have a pubmed subscription? How do you know 80% of them don't meet a standard if you didn't read them? That's a lot of work - something only a paid researcher would take the time to do.

I've read many more than 43.
I do have a pubmed subscription, along with a couple of others that have studies like these appear in them.

As for being a paid researcher, no, I'm not. I have had about six years to do this though.