To: Just another Joe
I read the abstracts. I'm not the one cutting and pasting - perhaps you are the one who should try to use the brain rather than the ctrl-c/ctrl-v buttons.
Ooooh, scary words. 'Peer related' and 'epedemiology.'
A - they aren't about children. B - they show exposure IS dangerous. You didn't read them. Game over.
168 posted on
08/17/2007 3:29:50 PM PDT by
mbraynard
(FDT: Less Leadership Experience than any president in US history)
To: mbraynard
Game over.Idiot kicks from deep in his own end zone and declares victory!
177 posted on
08/17/2007 3:39:50 PM PDT by
metesky
(Brought To You By Satriales Aerosol PorkChop Mist - The Finest New Jersey Has To Offer!)
To: mbraynard
A - they aren't about children. B - they show exposure IS dangerous. You didn't read them. Game over.A - They're studies on how ETS effects a human body
B - They show no statistical relation to cause.
I'v read more of them than you've counted so far.
If the game is over it's because you've surrendered.
It's apparent that you know nothing about how to read studies, nothing on how to rate causal or casual relationships from an epedemiological viewpoint, and can only rely on someone else to tell you what the results mean.
Go exercise your brain and learn something about what you want to talk about.
193 posted on
08/17/2007 4:28:38 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson