[gridlock]

You did the same thing I did and jumped to the other thread.

I don’t see why Romney’s camp would object to a factually based movie about something that happened over 150 years ago (which is the point of the article on the other thread).

[DanielLongo]

Since when were “Hollywood production” and “factually based movie” ever synonymous? Should I believe that “Braveheart” was a factual movie? It was touted as an historical piece and yet has very little to do with the real history of its characters. Why should I have confidence that Hollyweird is going to be fair to a Church that teaches its members not to view R rated movies?