[SubGeniusX]

LOL, what “big government” is used here? The courts are fundamental, and it is FAR from an “IDENTICLE” (SIC) tactic to correctly use the courts to enforce existing laws. That you cannot grasp that is simply indicative of your problem, not of the issues at hand.

In the same way that that the "Anti-Gunners", "Let's enforce Healthy Eating", Enviormentalists or any other Nanny Statist, have decided to to use the civil courts with lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers or Fast Food companies, etc... are attempting to "legislate through litigation"...

If you can't see these are two sides of the same coin then you are truly blind...

[SubGeniusX]

ok I’ve been at this thread for over 8 hours ... not ducking anybody just going to bed ...

BBL

[narses]

The blindness is yours. Your pursuit of a libertine society makes you blind to the damage. Thankfully you are a fringe voice in a much more rational society.

[Question_Assumptions]

In the same way that that the "Anti-Gunners", "Let's enforce Healthy Eating", Enviormentalists or any other Nanny Statist, have decided to to use the civil courts with lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers or Fast Food companies, etc... are attempting to "legislate through litigation"...

Since you seem to oppose legislation for the purpose of healthy eating and so on, does that mean that you think the FDA should be abolished and that the government should have no role in enforcing food or product safety? Do you think your neighbor should have the right to bear arms including mustard gas, serin, and truck bombs? Do you think the government should enforce traffic laws? You can simply summarize by explaining exactly what role you think government should have, if any, in encouraging or protecting public safety.

[mbraynard]

The Gun lobby got a congressional exemption. Nothing wrong with that.

Let's see you do the same with the porn biz.