[SubGeniusX]

You aren't joking about being a drug addict - but attempting to reason while you are on the pipe isn't smart.

hmmm getting a little smarmy, even a biting are we ...

and really ... "reason" was the last thing I was really trying to do as it can't be done with the unreasonable "Moral Nanny Staters" (Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.^*)... I'm however enjoying poking fun at the "Social^ist Conservatives" such as yourself...

So a civil litigant proves actual damages from a company' products to a jury based on a preponderance of the evidence, as has been done in this country for 100s of years, and you are declaring it a 'theocracy.'

So:
A. you are/were OK with this tactic when the Anti-Gun folks went after the Gun manufacturers?

or

B. are you a Hypocrite ...

take yer pick

[narses]

What a sleazy game -

A. you are/were OK with this tactic when the Anti-Gun folks went after the Gun manufacturers?

or

B. are you a Hypocrite ...

C - You are playing the sleaze game of only two alternatives that both fit your bizarro agenda of promoting a libertine society.

[mbraynard]

A. And if you can muster support to get a massive injunction passed by Congress for guns (as was appopriate and constitutional), good luck.