Posted on 08/14/2007 11:31:18 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Official: China knew about magnets
BEIJING, China (Reuters) -- China knew about problems with magnets on toys as long ago as March, an industry official said on Wednesday, following a second massive recall of Chinese-made Mattel toys due to hazards from small, powerful magnets.
Mattel's Barbie and Tanner doll set is one of the products being recalled.
1 of 2 Mattel Inc. the largest U.S. toy company, recalled millions more Chinese-made toys on Tuesday due to hazards from the magnets and lead paint, and warned it may recall additional products as it steps up testing.
"We knew about the situation, because since March some toys had been recalled due to magnetic-parts problems," an official with the China Toy Association, who declined to be identified, told Reuters.
She did not elaborate on why it had taken so long for something to be done.
The new recall involves about 18.2 million magnetic toys globally, including 9.5 million in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Where I work some products have been moved to China because the patent's expired, competitors copied them, uotsourced thwm to China and undercut us substantially in price.
I took years to find a source that could meet our specifications and pass inspection, every lot delivered is inspected using a sample plan, if any failures are found we go through everything 100%
Quality isn't something to expect from China, nor is consistency.
Oh and we barly make anything on these products now.
Good point. The Chinese are masters at copying but the quality isn’t the same. I saw something recently on one the news mag shows where the Chinese are now reproducing Venetian glass. Of course, it isn’t the same but from close-up, you can’t really tell the difference.
I think that was taken out of context.
I see I've triggered the rabid ridiculous absurd response strawman brigade. Please give me an example of such a toy.
Like U.S. manufacturers never poison people. Just here in ga a peanut butter plant was closed for a month due to botulism contamination. made several people rather ill. My response to your obnoxious statement rhymes with duck stew.
Point of curiosity: Do you happen to have any personal stake in "the China trade", i.e., as someone who owns or is employed by a company importing from China, or, associated with a "post-for-hire" service that represents clients with "China trade", or, as a stockholder in a company that derives significant revenue from "the China trade", etc?
nope
Point of curiosity: are you always this much of a jerk?
If ever there were a classic example of an incorrect conclusion drawn from flawed experimental data!
I suppose you had a 50% chance of observing this on any given such 'experiment' getting N-N or S-S orientation! Your sample size wuz 2 small!
F.J.... Are you a climate scientist by any chance?
Thank you.
Hey! I take that as an insult!
Whatever it was! Jerk!
;P
(FR is not for the faint of heart anymore, indeed!)
LOL! No. But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
I apologize Mr Wizard for disturbing his eternal rest.
All kidding aside, I do apologize DB, I was wrong.
I don’t know how I forgot the time that I was playing with a couple of very powerful magnets and dang near got my fingers crushed.
I accept.
Thank you.
Thank you for accepting my apology.
North poles repel north poles. South poles repel south poles.
Opposite poles are attracted to each other.
I’ve heard that procedure also works with nails that have the head on the wrong end.
Thanks for the info LilAngel.
You’re welcome. If you ever need to know anything, just ask me. I know everything there is to know about everything.
; )
And if I don’t know, I can usually make up something fairly convincing.
Right after YOU show ME an example of "So if a kid eats a smooth piece of glass and it breaks in the kid's innards" AND, someone suing "the company that made the glass."
Here's the way it works, luvverboy: if YOU can inject a hypothetical, and then tear it down, then YOU have established the propriety of -- at the very LEAST -- using a hypothetical.
For YOU to accuse ME of erecting a strawman, oh boy, now that's rich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.