Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

Actually, they have to show intent to molest. This guy showed intent when he set up a meeting.

The English Dept here is catching flak. You were right about them


62 posted on 08/14/2007 5:37:58 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
The English Dept here is catching flak. You were right about them

Believe me when I say I take no pleasure whatsoever in that. It's very sad (and one minor reason I moved on to teaching elsewhere)...

As to the intent, I have no problem charging the guy with "contributing to the delinquency..." or even "unlawful meeting" or whatever laws there actually are to describe what he did do. Bust his *ss! But, unless NBC releases the full transcripts or we get other info to the contrary, I have to lean towards what happened online as being somewhat ambiguous, hence the dismissal of other charges by the DA. I wouldn't be suprise to find out that the NBC stooge set up the meeting, etc., and this guy played along without any intent to show up. Likely (maybe not)? But possible?

94 posted on 08/14/2007 6:04:09 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwæt! Lãr biþ mæst hord, soþlïce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson