Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
If it gets the ratings, you should ask the same of the viewers. Very true. I can say that I've surfed through this program once or twice, but have never made a point of watching it.

I think that there are two schools of thought on this thread...those who condemn the perverts on the show (ie, viewers who watch the show because they like to see people get busted), and those who condemn the show itself (its sleaze factor, its methods, etc). What I don't see on this thread is a lot of people standing up and saying that the perverts on the show are just misunderstood. I think that everyone is in general agreement that these guys need to get what they deserve, it's just how they get there that we're arguing about. BTW, I condemn the show, because I think that it's vigilantism pure and simple, and that the end does not justify the means.

Now - if people (show producers, or just regular guys) would like to aid in a police investigation, or if the show turned over its evidence to law enforcement after obtaining it...then I think that I'd approve a little more. But, the fact that it needs to lure the perv in, and get some sort of a "Money Shot" interview on camera is sensationalist crap, to me.

I think that people will support this kind of justice, until it's their particular ox that gets gored. There aren't too many people who would support a child molester, for instance. But, what about people that spank their kids? That's a real hot button issue with a lot of people. If I choose to give wbill jr a swat on the rear - or even if I do something that's misconstrued (by a busybody neighbor, for instance) as spanking, I don't need Dateline showing up at my house with CPS looking to take my kid away.

To take it to an extreme...what about speeders? Drunk Drivers? People that have a beer, are still legally sober, and drive? Jaywalkers? Where does it stop? Just because something is "for the children" doesn't necessarily make it right - even if the end result is a positive one.

201 posted on 08/14/2007 8:46:13 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: wbill
Just because something is "for the children" doesn't necessarily make it right - even if the end result is a positive one

I think the problem with the "Go GET'EM" crowd is that in general they have this puritanical religious fervor that minimizes the need for due process and fairness and subjugates all to a strict moral code that rejects the need to "presume innocence until proven guilty". Theyre sort of like jihadists, and it is beyond scary.

205 posted on 08/14/2007 8:55:03 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson