The man got online and talked about having sex with a minor, even agreeing to having a meeting. And, he was a district attorney.
2 options here:
1. He was conducting his own legitimate sting operation or was trying to see what girls would agree to an illegal act. In either case, he should have notified his superiors/colleagues of what he was doing. By all indications, he was not conducting a legitimate exercise.
2. He was trolling for minor girls to have illegal sex with. Either he got scared or had a flat or something.
Let me ask you a question. How would you defend a 42 year-old man talking dirty and arranging to have sex with a 14 year-old girl? Under what circumstances is that acceptable behavior?
Wedlock?
My major issue in this whole matter deals with the possibility of “entrapment.”