Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
The flip side to sanctuary cities is having Clinton-appointed judges shoot down local laws that try to enforce federal laws against illegal immigrants, such as what happened with Hazelton recently.

The 'local laws' to which you refer are unconstitutional.

100 posted on 08/14/2007 7:03:18 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: DCPatriot
The 'local laws' to which you refer are unconstitutional.

Horsecrap. Using the logic of the judge in the Hazelton case, local communities could not enforce state traffic laws such as requiring registration or insurance. It is pure nonsense.

103 posted on 08/14/2007 7:09:00 AM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DCPatriot
The 'local laws' to which you refer are unconstitutional.

Huh? Does that mean that I don't have to pay local property taxes?

Do you know that the judge in the Hazelton case cited "foreign agreements" in his argument? In other words, the Hazelton laws would violate agreements with mexico. Think of the doors that opens for the terrorists and illegals from all over the world.

On another note, why should we import millions from one culture and no others?

117 posted on 08/14/2007 8:37:32 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson