Via Noel Sheppard, the guys who exposed the big data bug in the NASA temperature calculations last week have now responded to the global warming believers who naturally downplayed the error and dismissed it as irrelevant to GW trends. No commentary here from me; just follow the drill from the last post and read Steve McIntyres and Warren Meyers posts slowly and carefully. The bullet points version of McIntyre to guide you as you go:
1. NASA and James Hansen have allegedly shown an astonishing amount of bad faith in protecting their bogus numbers. Last weeks posts noted how secretive Hansen has been in hoarding the algorithm he uses to make temperature adjustments, but most of McIntyres wrath this time is reserved for NASA, which pointedly declined to mention prominently that it had revised its own data lest it attract any unwelcome public attention.
2. While the revisions to U.S. data didnt have an affect on global averages, they did obviously have a significant effect on U.S. averages while pointing up potential errors in data collection worldwide. Specifically, according to McIntyre, not only are certain U.S. temperature measurement stations that are thought to be unreliable being adjusted by algorithm, even stations not thought to be unreliable may be undergoing adjustment. Quote:
Don’t look for this to get any MSM coverage.
It’s a religion, and GW is one of the dogmas. Don’t expect them to tell the truth on that.