Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maigrey

The “ports deal” was a CIA front to get our agents into 137 ports in which we have little intel capability. The story appeared on Foxnews and in the NY Times. You need to drop that mantra. Immigration sucked and Miers was not my choice either... but the ports deal was something other than what it appeared.

LLS


49 posted on 08/13/2007 4:22:43 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: LibLieSlayer
The “ports deal” was a CIA front to get our agents into 137 ports in which we have little intel capability.

I've not heard this before. If true, that is truly pathetic & explains a lot. I thought the CIA was supposed to be "incognito". To try to use something like this as a front - something sure to inflame the American people so much - shows either a completely deaf ear or an absolutely willfull disregard for the good of the country.

Any way I look at it, I think the CIA needs to be completely cleaned out & restructured back to where they can be effective.

I am also glad to see Rove go - a little too little too late, but better late than never, I guess.

77 posted on 08/13/2007 5:44:37 AM PDT by alicewonders (Duncan Hunter. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson