False.
...and has been used to prove living objects were thousands of years old, like that Clam.
False.
Now, either that part of the earth didn't "age" along with the rest of the earth, or there is something seriously wrong with "old earth" assumptions.
Tie this all together with the "global warming" arguments and geology, which show that same region was considerably warmer in the not so distant past and ice free (4,000 years)yet has animals "hairy elephants", rhino's, saber toothed tigers, fox, wolf, squirels, rabbits all frozen and buried at the same time, which are assumed to be much older (millions of years) when found in other parts of the world, and you have a huge discrepancy of evolutionary theory and "science".
Of course, it's much more convenient to publish a weak thoery then sweep all this under the rug, and hope it's never mentioned again.
Of course, that is just one (but rather large) example of the flaws and unanswered questions of evolutional theory, there are many many others, such as-
If the grand canyon was formed over millions of years, If that happened, wouldnt you expect to find a gigantic river delta where the Colorado River enters the Gulf of California? Its not there. Nor can geologists find it anywhere else. Where did all the dirt, 800 cubic miles of it, go?
Catastrophic event answers that quite easily.
For those who are interested in other theories that explain what evolution theory cannot, you might want to read this
I know Coyoteman hasn't read it. It's "satanic" to him. He's afraid he might become possessed if he read it.
don't they do exorcism rituals in the church of evolution?
So, just what DO you know abot Carbon dating?
True
and
true