>>The argument against the procedure for girls but supportive for boys really boils down to the amount of tissue.
Look, I’m no fan of male circumcision, and we declined to have it done when our son was born. Just to establish my bona fides on this issue.
That said, your statement that I’ve quoted above, is one of the more ridiculous assertions I’ve seen lately.
Using female genital mutilation threads to push an anti-male circumcision agenda, and attempting to equate the two, is just prima facie absurd. Go start another thread, probably in Chat, to push your agenda.
Hey, I responded to a post someone else made about male circumcision. If you don't want to post about it, that's fine, but here we are.
Really what is so ridiculous about the statement relating to the amount of tissue removed? If simply the clitoral hood were removed from the girl, you'd be fine with it?