Like I just told Lexinom, you cannot win if you don’t have an organization.
Issues don’t matter if you don’t have a campaign.
You seem to be trying to fight reality here with semantics.
Rudy and Fred didn’t need to win. Mitt did. McCain is already DOA. The others had to at least place. Hunter didn’t.
Get it?
When people are looking for a candidate to support, are they going to throw away their money on a bona fide loser?
No. That’s called a bad investment.
People don’t need Rudy or Fred to prove themselves. They are already the top two candidates. Mitt needed to win to prove he has a chance at being competitive on the ground through sheer organizational force.
And really, no one cares about your vote. Elections aren’t about the little guy going out on his own and casting a ballot. They are about the party’s GOTV machine. Karl Rove knows that, why don’t you? Even Howard Dean finally learned that in time for the midterms, so maybe there is still hope for you, too.
Again, you waste your time with us “1%-ers”....your paid consultants don’t equal votes or support.
If what you say was true, we’d have President Dean, but since we don’t, I value your opinion as much as this purchased (and meaningless) “poll”, which was a test of NOTHING more than who has more money than common sense and can buy the most “votes”.