Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClaireSolt
That is true, and improved biofuels are especially promising as an oil replacement (though they make CO2 just like oil does) in terms of the technology coming on line and to be expected in the next 10 years or so. But alternates other than ethanol still only contribute a fraction of 1% of human energy use. Hydropower is more important, and nuclear vastly more important. Coal is not scarce, is cheap, and is more important than all of them. Coal's supposed black mark is its CO2 footprint, and that appears to be largely based on unfounded fears. If we don't care about CO2 footprints in the near term, coal and ethanol look like easy replacements for expensive oil.
126 posted on 08/12/2007 8:16:46 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC

Very interesting!


129 posted on 08/12/2007 10:27:18 AM PDT by sourcery (fRed Dawn: Wednesday, 5 November 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson