Perhaps this is an interesting article, but the author lost me right here. Why does she think her sex makes any difference in her political analysis?
Conditioning. Feinstein came out in support of Hillary to promote the ‘first woman in the White House’. The MSM is relentless in promoting her as the first woman President and expecting women to vote for her for that reason alone. Most women are smarter than that.
**************
That was my reaction as well.
Sex doesn’t mean a thing to Hillary. I believe she was using Bill like she is trying to use us. She has always had the office of President in her sites. As long as Bill didn’t interfer with that idea, she didn’t care what he did. Personally, I think she’s gay....it just hasn’t come out yet. That aside, this woman would be the death of this country. There are plenty of women qualified to be President........good honest women. We don’t need a yelling screaming bitch in that office.
I believe that the author was simply trying to convey the
idea that whether we like it or not, if she is elected as the FIRST WOMAN President, it will reflect badly upon all women for a long, long, long time in the future.
Women, especially have a lot more to lose than men if Hillary is indeed elected.