Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2; perseid 67
dragnet2 wrote:
"The chances of females having to physically engage with people/criminals in law enforcement is much greater than would be in the military."

...not in a combat specialty during a war.

"Hand to hand combat is nearly a thing of the past in the military, where as on the streets, it can be an everyday occurrence. That's why I said, If they can be cops, they can be drafted into the army.

There is much more time and emphasis on hand-to-hand (incl. bayonets) combat training and training with various kinds of weapons in combat specialties. There have been quite a few trials with women in combat specialties in various armies of the world (including our own). Those did not work out. The differences in such trials are apparent on the first day. And remember that you mentioned physical engagement.

"BTW, have you ever served in the military?"

I've done both.
94 posted on 08/10/2007 8:24:09 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
not in a combat specialty during a war.

What every your point is you're wrong. Again, the chances of females having to *physically* engage with people/criminals in law enforcement is *much* greater than would be in the military." I am speaking in general term here, not specialty crap.

You see, in the military, you generally just shoot your opponent. There is little rolling around having a punch out in the military with the enemy. Didn't say it doesn't happen, but in law enforcement, it can happen *every night*.

This is not even debateable.

97 posted on 08/10/2007 8:34:55 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson