Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush War Adviser Says Draft Worth a Look
Breitbart ^ | August 10, 2007 | RICHARD LARDNER

Posted on 08/10/2007 4:12:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m sure Bush wish he hadn’t made this comment.


141 posted on 08/11/2007 5:04:46 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowannabe

ping


142 posted on 08/11/2007 6:11:30 AM PDT by Iowannabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

“Tough. They can choose conscientious objector status if they like. Or sit in prison where they would undoubtedly be assigned war-effort support work.”


You really didn’t read my entire post, did you.


143 posted on 08/11/2007 6:23:59 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“And if they were drafted to serve in a support role, or medical role, transportation role you would not go along with this?”


You, as several, have missed a big point in my post. But to really get it would require actually blowing the dust off of a Bible and reading the passages of Scripture I included.

You are correct. I stated quite clearly that (1.) it is a part of our biblicist Christian faith, (2.) our daughters have been diligently trained in this area from infancy, that they have a particular biblical roll. My post was clear enough.


144 posted on 08/11/2007 6:27:47 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“The preservation of our republic is more important than anyone’s beliefs about women in combat.”


then what we will be fighting for will bear very little resemblance to the Republic of our forefathers.


145 posted on 08/11/2007 6:29:43 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

spot on.


146 posted on 08/11/2007 6:31:56 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo
“And some people just don’t get that some women join the military out of a sense of patriotism and duty to country. Doesn’t have anything to do with their “relgious” beliefs, it goes beyond that. I can’t fathom those that can’t understand that women can have the same kind of honor and pride in their country and want to serve in the military.”

Did anyone say anything about anyone else’s daughters?

I am amazed. The last time this issue came up, I was told by a dozen or more that I was out in the wind for even believing that a re-institution of the draft could take place at all. Now, the replies to my post indicate that nobody read past the first paragraph.

147 posted on 08/11/2007 6:35:55 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: perseid 67
“Just exactly who is pushing putting women on the front lines?”

I don’t know WHO (specifically) is pushing it, but I do believe, much from my 6-1/2 years in the Air Force, that the Armed Forces are a laboratory for social experimentation. I also believe that that social experimentation is in the LIBERAL and anti-family direction.

What is the name of that woman who became quite well known in the past several years because she had her legs blown off while piloting a combat helicopter over a hot fire zone? what was the name of that female who wrote the book, “Love My Rifle More Than You” ? She wrote of kicking in doors in urban fighting along with men (she was an Army intelligence). She documented women in combat operations. She also documented some serious immorality among the troops.

148 posted on 08/11/2007 6:52:02 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you for bringing up the Civil War example. What was done then with respect to instituting a draft was UNCONSTITUTIONAL as was several other actions by Lincoln and company. Not to say immoral, as those who could afford it could “buy” their way out of serving in the northern forces.

Again, cite chapter and verse indicating that a draft is anything BUT a disgrace to our laws and our concept of a free society. Simply citing past historical examples is pretty lame. We locked up thousands of Japanese citizens during WWII. Well hell, if it can be done then lets get to it some more, laws be darned! (sarcasm off)


149 posted on 08/11/2007 9:10:00 AM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Snapping Turtle

True, but President Bush should have expanded the military immediately after Sept 11th. Even with reenlistment numbers up, units are feeling the stress and strain of multiple deployments. We need a few more divisions, to offset the current deployment rotation, and to refit our major strike units.

President Bush and all the other “great thinkers” underestimated the Iraq insurgency, and are now in some sort of weird collective denial about troop and equipment readiness. Now they have the so called “war czar” out there floating trial balloons for a “draft”.


150 posted on 08/11/2007 9:18:54 AM PDT by Rush4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

I think if you read the stories of Betty (?) Zane and others like her in that era, then you’d quickly agree that women have well served our nation in time of war.

But, you should place what I said in the context of war. In all our war, ANY American should be willing to fight and defend.


151 posted on 08/11/2007 11:56:11 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke; P-Marlowe

As commander in chief in time of war, it was a rational (and constitutional) act for Lincoln to initiate the calling out of the militia and for Roosevelt to control a suspect population. (They call it profiling....something we should be doing at our terminals and ports.)

Historic examples of militia being called out to protect their nation/communities are more than sufficient evidence that the nation expected the able-bodied to defend.


152 posted on 08/11/2007 12:02:00 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Always ready to fight and to defend. Not ready to acquiesce to the anti-Christian culture of the social experimenters that are among military planners.

You are a retired military chaplain? This is not picking at you, but I was sent to an Air Force chaplain in 1979 by my squadron commander. I had completed all requirements for graduation from a non commissioned officers leadership training school. The graduation “ceremony” was required, however; couldn’t graduate without attendance. It was actually a liquor and dance event at the NCO Club, during which the diploma issuing ceremony would take place. We were even REQUIRED to bring a date; of course, one could bring his spouse.

When I requested that the diplomas be issued and then those of us who neither attend drinking parties or dances be excused, I was sent to a CHAPLAIN(!) who tried to convince me that drinking and dancing was perfectly fine. He really did try! I didn’t bite. Hey, even my daughters are willing to defend. They are very good with firearms, too. But they are not willing to live modern military co-ed life, and they are not willing to compromise their homes.

153 posted on 08/11/2007 1:58:20 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

It sounds like we agree on fighting and defending in extremity.

As for what a chaplain did years ago, I’m glad you stuck up for your principles. I would agree with the commander that there are excellent esprit-de-corps reasons for attending unit functions. I would agree that a commander can even require attendance at those functions.

There is no commander, however, who can require you to consume alcohol.

I would recommend attending a team-building event, but would commend you for attending while maintaining your principles about consuming alcohol.


154 posted on 08/11/2007 4:01:56 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
No, I said "kept out of at all reasonable expense," not kept away from nearby support roles.
155 posted on 08/11/2007 6:11:19 PM PDT by unspun (We are still in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

all the men will have to leave the country. I would never serve under a power hungry amazon like that.


156 posted on 08/12/2007 7:02:47 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END WELFARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; y'all
-- we should have universal military service like Switzerland and Israel. No exemptions, student deferments, and so forth - everyone serves, in some capacity.

Actual service isn't really necessary, -- just a short basic boot camp type obligation -- 8 weeks say, at the age of 18, -- would do the trick, and probably double volunteer enlistments.

157 posted on 08/12/2007 11:32:03 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke; y'all
Again, cite chapter and verse indicating that a draft is anything BUT a disgrace to our laws and our concept of a free society.

Calling up the militia as per Article I Section 8 is in effect a draft, and its necessity is explained by the opening lines of the 2nd, -- a militia being '-- necessary to the security of a free state, --".

Service to our country is required by our oath of Citizenship. -- Anyone is free to leave that thinks this concept is a disgrace to our laws and our free society.

158 posted on 08/12/2007 11:51:13 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Perhaps this is just preparing citizens for the need if one or more of our cities are nuked?


159 posted on 08/12/2007 10:38:34 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson