Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody; netmilsmom
I understand, but no one stops NARAL and Planned Parenthood and so forth from putting things (i.e. pictures of happy women who have, supposedly, improved their lives through abortion) where children can see them.

Except a four year old who can't read just sees a pictures of a smiling woman and DOESN'T get their pro-abortion message. Children are far more capable of interpreting pictures than words and the graphic photos of a butchered baby are going to have far more of an impact on a child that a picture of a smiling woman which message they don't understand.

228 posted on 08/10/2007 6:40:34 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Children are far more capable of interpreting pictures than words and the graphic photos of a butchered baby are going to have far more of an impact on a child that a picture of a smiling woman which message they don't understand.

That's true. Sounds like a teaching opportunity for mom.

I wonder, of those who are carrying on about this truck, how many allow their kids to be around violent movies, or watch TV shows on the health channel that feature surgeries.

281 posted on 08/12/2007 12:48:19 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson