Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fanfan; Spyder; jimrob
The bolded section suggests you believe the code pinkos have a valid point of view.

Read through the last several posts. Either Spyder believes that the Code Pinkos and the pro-life movement BOTH have a valid point of view, or that neither does. In any event, Spyder puts the pro-life movement on exactly the same plane as the Code Pinkos and THAT is what I find most disgusting.

226 posted on 08/10/2007 6:09:23 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

They both are entitled to their point of view. It’s their manner of expressing it that I disagree with. Let me phrase this differently - I don’t see any difference between you putting F*U*C*# ABORTIONISTS on the side of a van than I do what has been put there by the “pro-life” org. If it’s legal to paint obscenities on vans, then heck - whatever. My kids are grown now. But we dealt with a jerk of a Republican nominee from Indiana whose ads were broadcast in Louisville when my kids were little. I didn’t let them watch R movies or obscenity at that age; neither did I want them watching abortions.

If you don’t want the libs showing your kindergarten-age kids how to don a condom, leave off with the radical stuff out where kids can see it.


233 posted on 08/10/2007 6:59:34 PM PDT by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson