[fanfan]

Would you be as supportive if some liberal anti-war group pasted huge photos of dead and injured troops on the side of trucks and drove around school yards proclaiming to kids they shouldn’t go be soldiers?

That's dishonest.

Troops volunteer to protect us, and bravely risk their lives. A 4-8 week old child in the womb has no such choice.

[rollo tomasi]

Also the fact that the families of the soldiers shown would sue the crap out of the anti-war crowd.

Also the straw man of the dead soldier could easily be turned around “Son, those men sacrificed their lives so you can be free.” "Those are men of courage” etc,etc,etc...What do the pro-aborts have "That's not a baby" "That blob of tissue died so you can have "risk free" intercourse" etc,etc,etc...

As a young child, I remember going to an anti-war movie called ‘Heroes’ that had Fonzi in it (’Happy Days’ was very popular then). One scene involved a soldier getting his face blown off. I 1)Thought it was gross 2)Made me appreciate the characters sacrifice 3)Did not have bad dreams 4)Did not turn me into an anti-war/freedom not worth dying for idiot.

[metmom]

That’s not dishonest. It’s a perfectly good analogy.

So would YOU be as supportive of a group showing dead and butchered soldiers to end the war? That’s what war is really like.

Pro-lifers are showing pictures of dead and butchered babies to stop the carnage of abortion and you’re OK with that.