>>I’m sorry but I’m glad your nephew was traumatized<<
You can’t be both.
FReepers champion “parental rights” when it comes to many things.
This should be another.
You don’t have the right to scare or sicken children so that you can show these horrors to the adults that need to see them.
Stay away from the beaches and amusement parks. Show some class.
I’m sorry he had to be traumatized at all, I’m glad the pictures traumatized him because if they didn’t he would be a very disturbed individual.
I don’t know the circumstances of your situation, I was talking about this particular news story, nowhere does it say they were concentrated in amusement parks or beaches, just regular city streets.
I’m not sure why you felt the need to bring up something not relevant to the story.
And you don't have the right to tell someone what they can paint on their own truck.
What about the kid on the truck, wonder how he feels?
“You don’t have the right to scare or sicken children so that you can show these horrors to the adults that need to see them.”
Children see rotten things daily on the TV. Death and mayhem. Explain to a child, should one see the pics and be traumatized, the why of it, so the child will understand that little people still in the womb, like he or she once was, are being harmed by bad policies. Frankly, I doubt that many children actually make the connection when young, and if they are older, then they will understand the explanation as to what the pictures are trying to convey. I’m all for this.
People (in particular women) need to see the results of their actions so that it is not just an abstract concept. I might add, it is because the MSM tries to stifle any pro-life debate and what the actual social, psychological and physical repercussions of abortions are, that forces more drastic measures to get the word out. These trucks are one method to get the reality of abortions before the public when so many other avenues of discussion are muted or hidden by the MSM. Go for it. Whatever works.