Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganesque

I’ll bite.

If you go for the person who is merely “electable”, you wind up with a bunch of mealy-mouthed populists who are completely unable to make an unpopular decision for the benefit of the country.

Exhibit A: The House of Representatives.

Exhibit B: The Senate.

I don’t think I have ever seen such a namby-pamby collection of outright losers than those circus geek rejects we have “representing” us... my state notwithstanding.

That, my FRiend, is what “pragmatism” gets us. I find it unacceptable.

APf


24 posted on 08/10/2007 9:09:18 AM PDT by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: APFel

Then where are are the true belivers that have been elected?

I know the list for the most part, but I still pose the question.

How do you get past this given our current situation as far as who can vote etc....


30 posted on 08/10/2007 9:14:12 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: APFel

>> That, my FRiend, is what “pragmatism” gets us. I find it unacceptable.

Over the past 27 years, pragmatism (or pragmatic conservatism) has given us Ronald Reagan, George Bush and George W. Bush instead of Jimmy Carter (2nd term), Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerry (reputed Vitenam veteran).

I still fail to see why “electablity” is a bad thing ... without it, you’ve got Pat Buchanan or Alan Keyes. Absolutely brilliant men (though Buchanan has some occasional weirdness) who sit at home between elections.

H


42 posted on 08/10/2007 10:21:37 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson